Let's grow your business. 2 new positions just opened Wednesday, 11 November. Book a free call today.
Uncategorised 11 min read

Why are my RFQs not turning into orders?

Why are my RFQs not turning into orders?: Email, SMS and voice outreach from an AI sales agent converging into a booked calendar appointment.
Email, SMS and voice outreach from an AI sales agent converging into a booked calendar appointment.

RFQs often fail to turn into orders for three reasons: the shop quotes work it was never likely to win, quotes too slowly, or never follows up. One machine shop that screened out poor-fit RFQs converted 40 to 50 percent of good-fit requests against 4 percent for the rest, and cut quoting work by 20 percent with no drop in orders.

The short answer from LeadsNow AI: LeadsNow recommends treating an RFQ pipeline that will not convert as three separate problems, poor fit, slow turnaround and missing follow-up, and measuring each one before changing prices. Score every RFQ before you quote it, track hit rate per customer, and log unworked quotes apart from lost ones so you fix the right leak.

Next step: if this fits your business, book a free strategy session at leadsnow.ai/strategy-session/ – a 2-minute fit check, then pick a time.

At a glance

  • Fit: in the Modern Machine Shop example (2019), good-fit RFQs converted at 40 to 50 percent; a poor-fit class converted at 4 percent.
  • Customer: in The Fabricator’s example quote database (2019), one customer won at 12.6 percent against a 22 percent shop average.
  • Counting: an unworked quote logged as a lost bid makes your hit rate look worse than it is and points you at price instead of follow-up.

Why RFQs stall: the four causes, in the order to test them

RFQs stall for four testable reasons, and the cheapest test is to sort your last 50 to 100 quotes by fit, customer, days-to-quote and follow-up status before touching price.

The causes below are ordered by how cheaply you can test them from data you already hold, not by severity.

Four causes of unconverted RFQs, the symptom each leaves in a quote log and the test that isolates it; the fit test alone separated 40 to 50 percent conversion from 4 percent in one shop.
Cause Symptom in your quote log Test that isolates it Fix
Poor fit Many quotes for low quantities, low part values or processes you rarely win Hit rate for good-fit vs other RFQs (Modern Machine Shop shop: 40 to 50% vs 4%) Screen before quoting
Low-yield customer or middleman One buyer sends hundreds of quotes and awards almost nothing Hit rate by customer against your shop average Ask why, then cut effort
Slow or undeliverable quote Lost quotes took longer to send than won ones; delivery dates you could not meet Days-to-quote for won vs lost quotes Decline what you cannot deliver; quote good fits first
No follow-up Quotes with no recorded outcome after weeks Share of quotes with no buyer decision logged Chase to a decision; log a reason

How it works

Turning RFQs into orders in four steps

01

Score the RFQ

Rate fit, buyer type, turnaround and follow-up readiness from 0 to 2 each. Quote 7-8 first, question 3 or less.

02

Check customer hit rate

Compare the buyer’s hit rate with your shop average. Under half after 20 quotes goes on review.

03

Quote what you can deliver

Decline RFQs whose delivery date you cannot meet. Send good-fit quotes first and track days-to-quote.

04

Chase to a decision

Follow up every quote until you get a yes, a no with a reason or a new date. Log unworked quotes apart from lost ones.

Screen and score each RFQ before quoting, then measure customer hit rate, turnaround and follow-up so you fix the real leak.

MAKE MORE SALES.

Pay-Per-Result pricing — We scale sales HARD aligned to your interests, better than anyone else.

FAQ: RFQs that do not turn into orders

What is a good RFQ hit rate for a job shop?

There is no audited industry benchmark. Paperless Parts, a quoting software vendor, writes that job shops win about 30% of the jobs they quote, and the example shop in The Fabricator’s 2019 quote-database article averaged 22%. Your own average, split by customer, is the number that matters.

Should I stop quoting a customer with a low hit rate?

Not straight away. Ask the buyer why you are losing and check whether they send you other work, such as time-and-materials jobs, that the quote log misses. If the rate stays under half your average after that, cut the effort.

How fast should I return a quote?

Fast enough that the buyer is still deciding. Modern Machine Shop reports that one shop which stopped quoting poor-fit RFQs could respond to the good ones more quickly, and its owner believes that helps it win orders. Measure your own days-to-quote against your won and lost quotes.

How many times should I follow up on a quote?

Follow up until the buyer gives you a decision, a reason or a new date. A quote with no recorded outcome is unworked, not lost, so keep chasing it on a set schedule and log what the buyer said each time.

Should I quote RFQs that come through a broker or middleman?

Often not, if you cannot win on price. The Modern Machine Shop example filters out middlemen by asking whether the source is ready to issue the order, checking whether the company makes a product that needs the part, and asking for the target price.

Rules of thumb for turning RFQs into orders

RFQ conversion rules of thumb come down to four checks, each taken from the shop examples cited on this page or from the worked example further down.

  • If an RFQ fails your fit screen, expect a hit rate closer to the 4 percent poor-fit figure than the 40 to 50 percent good-fit figure in the Modern Machine Shop example.
  • If a customer’s hit rate is under half your shop average (customer J at 8.8 against 22 percent in The Fabricator’s example), ask the buyer why before you quote them again.
  • If you cannot meet the delivery date, do not quote: the Fabricator shop that adopted this rule reports 98 percent on-time delivery.
  • If 30 of every 100 quotes have no recorded outcome, your decided hit rate is about 40 percent higher than the one you report (31 against 22 percent in the worked example below).

Want this done for you? We book qualified sales appointments on a Pay-Per-Result basis — you only pay for calls that actually land in your calendar.

The RFQ Triage Framework: score every RFQ before you quote it

The RFQ Triage Framework scores each RFQ from 0 to 8 on fit, buyer type, turnaround and follow-up readiness, and the total decides quote first, quote normally or decline.

The framework is a LeadsNow decision rule built from the screens the shops in the sources use. The fit thresholds in the first row are the ones Advance CNC Machining told Modern Machine Shop it uses (at least 100 pieces, or 50 for a very complex part, and at least $40 a piece, in US dollars); replace them with the line your own won-quote history draws.

RFQ Triage Framework scoring: four factors scored 0 to 2, so an RFQ scoring 7 or 8 is quoted first and one scoring 3 or less is declined or questioned.
Factor 2 points 1 point 0 points
Fit Inside your proven sweet spot (example: 100+ pieces, $40+ a piece) Borderline on quantity, value or process Outside it, or equipment you do not have
Buyer type Repeat customer at or above your shop hit rate New buyer who makes the product the part goes into Middleman, redacted print, or a customer under half your hit rate
Turnaround You can quote inside your normal window and meet the delivery date Quote will be late but delivery is achievable Delivery date cannot be met
Follow-up readiness Named decision-maker, decision date and a follow-up booked Contact known, no decision date No contact beyond a portal or a generic inbox

Act on the total: 7 or 8, quote it first and fastest; 4 to 6, quote in normal order; 3 or less, decline, or ask the buyer for a target price and a decision date before spending estimator time. Asking for the target price is one of the middleman tests in the Modern Machine Shop article.

Per-customer hit rate: when to stop quoting a buyer

A per-customer hit rate shows which buyers are worth quoting, and in The Fabricator’s example quote database five customers sat under the shop’s 22 percent average.

The figures below are from that article’s example quote database (Vincent Bozzone, 2019). The “what to do” column is our decision rule, not the article’s, and it assumes the customer sends you no other work outside the quote log.

Per-customer hit rates against a 22 percent shop average: customer J won $30,500 of $348,000 quoted (8.8 percent) but would be worth about $76,000 at the average rate.
Customer (Fabricator example) Quotes and dollars Hit rate Gap to 22% average What to do
J $348,000 quoted, $30,500 won 8.8% About $46,000 more at the average rate Develop: ask why you lose; order size near $1,000
F Not stated 12.6% Would have gained $244,000 at 22% (article’s figure) Develop: biggest dollar gap, find out what wins
B 135 quotes, $1,900 won 4.9% Small orders Cut effort: quote only top-scoring RFQs
N 254 quotes, $2,775 won of $87,000 3.2% Effort far exceeds return Stop unless the buyer agrees to a narrower scope
M Quotes sent, no business awarded 0% All effort wasted Stop quoting until the buyer explains

The stop rule we suggest: once a customer has had at least 20 quotes from you, put them on review if their hit rate is under half your shop average, and stop quoting after a review conversation that does not change it. Twenty is an assumption; fit it to your RFQ volume. CADDi’s RFQ management guide makes the same call: decline RFQs from customers where your historical win rate is very low and who seem to include you only for competitive bidding, after first asking whether they would limit bids to work that fits you.

If we can’t make you money, we don’t deserve yours.

Pay-Per-Result pricing — performance-based alignment.

50,769+
AI-booked appointments
7×
Average sales lift — median closer to 4×
Pay-Per-Result
Performance-based alignment

The counting mistake: unworked quotes logged as lost bids

Logging unworked quotes as lost bids is a counting error: a quote nobody chased is not lost, and mixing the two makes follow-up look like a price problem.

Here is an illustrative worked example, with assumed numbers rather than benchmarks. A shop sends 100 quotes in a quarter. It wins 22, hears “no” with a reason on 48, and has 30 with no outcome recorded because nobody called back.

Worked example with assumed inputs: logging 30 unworked quotes as lost makes the hit rate 22 percent, while the decided hit rate is 31 percent.
Measure Formula Result
Reported hit rate (unworked counted as lost) 22 won / 100 sent 22%
Decided hit rate 22 won / (22 won + 48 lost) 31%
Unworked share 30 / 100 sent 30%
Orders if unworked quotes close at the decided rate 30 x 31% About 9 more orders

The fix: give every quote one of four statuses (won, lost with a reason, no decision yet, unworked). If unworked quotes are your biggest bucket, the problem is follow-up, not price, and the playbook on quotes sent where nobody replies applies. For older quotes, see how to reactivate dead quotes.

Turnaround and follow-up: the two causes you control this week

Quote turnaround and follow-up are the two RFQ causes a shop can change within a week, because neither needs new equipment, new customers or a price cut.

On turnaround, track days from RFQ received to quote sent, and compare won and lost quotes. Paperless Parts suggests testing whether returning quotes within 24 hours lifts your win rate, and suggests calling a buyer who has opened a quote several times without accepting it.

On follow-up, set a rule your team can keep: a first check-in two business days after the quote, a second at the buyer’s stated decision date, and a final call asking for a decision or a reason. Those intervals are our suggestion, not a measured optimum. For a wider view on response speed in trade businesses, see speed to lead for trade businesses.

What fixing RFQ conversion costs if you do it yourself

Fixing RFQ conversion yourself costs mostly time: a few hours to build the quote log, minutes per RFQ to score it, and a weekly block for follow-up calls.

The Fabricator article notes most of the data is already in your main system; a spreadsheet with customer, dollars quoted, dollars won and outcome status is enough to start. The hardest part to staff is the follow-up itself: someone who calls every open quote on schedule and records the answer. If that is your gap, a service that runs follow-up and booking, such as LeadsNow’s database reactivation for quoted-but-never-closed jobs, is one option. For custom manufacturers, see lead generation for custom trailer manufacturers and tracking which leads become booked jobs.

Sources

Pay-Per-Result appointments

See if we’re a fit

We book qualified sales appointments for you and you pay on results, not retainers. Our booking page asks a few quick questions so you find out in two minutes whether that model suits your business.

  • 50,769+ appointments booked without cold calling.
  • Pay-Per-Result pricing — you pay for booked, qualified calls.
  • Pick your own time on our live calendar, no phone tag.

View all articles

Pay-Per-Result · No retainers

Turn this into booked sales calls.

Our AI agents, trained on 50,769+ booked appointments, fill your calendar with pre-qualified buyers. You only pay when calls land.

Keep reading

Related on Leads Now AI

The thesis behind everything we do

Why Pay-Per-Result is the only marketing pricing model that aligns the agency with you

Leads Now AI is a 100% Pay-Per-Result marketing agency. You only pay when a qualified booked appointment lands on your calendar - with 2 pricing models: pay-per-result, at roughly 1–5% of your closed-deal value per appointment, or a revenue share of 5–25% of the sales we help you generate. Both bill on outcomes. Not on clicks. Not on lead-form fills. Not on retainer months. Not on “strategy hours.” If the calendar stays empty, you owe zero. See full pricing →

1. Incentives align

The agency only succeeds when you succeed. We eat the cost of bad ad creative, bad lists and no-shows. You never pay for our learning curve.

2. Self-selecting shortlist

Only an agency confident in its delivery can operate this model. The pool of Pay-Per-Result agencies is tiny precisely because most agencies can’t survive on it. Pick from the agencies who can.

3. Cost cannot detach from revenue

Priced as a share of the revenue we generate, your acquisition cost stays sustainable across LTV bands. A $500-membership business and a $50,000-engagement business can both run the model profitably.

4. No retainer trap

The standard engagement carries no monthly retainer - nothing arrives on your invoice regardless of outcome. No 6 or 12-month lock-in, no clawback on appointments already delivered, cancel any time with 14 days notice. Early-stage businesses that need the sales systems built first are quoted scoped groundwork up front, never a standing fee.

5. De-risks the pilot

Test before commitment. A small scope-based setup fee covers hard build costs; everything after that is purely outcome-linked. There’s no “we’ll see how it performs after $30k of spend.”

6. Forces agency discipline

If nobody books, or none of your meetings show, we eat the cost. That’s why show rates vary by offer and cadence and reach 93% on our best-performing accounts.

The volume argument

A fully-ramped human SDR produces on the order of $200,000 a year. They work one conversation at a time, sleep, take leave, and cap out at a territory. Our agents work every lead in the list in parallel - responding in seconds, following up indefinitely without getting bored, and adding capacity without adding headcount.

At 100 qualified booked appointments a month against a $5,000 average deal value, that is $500,000 of booked pipeline every month - roughly what one SDR produces in two and a half years.

Read that precisely: booked pipeline means appointments multiplied by your average deal value. It is not closed revenue - closing is your side of the table, and your close rate decides what lands. The inputs above are a worked example; we size them to your actual deal economics before quoting. What we can evidence on our own numbers: 50,769+ appointments delivered since 2017, database reactivation converting 4.4–8.9% on dormant CRM lists, and show rates that vary by offer and reminder cadence - up to 93% on our best-performing accounts.

The proof: 50,769+ AI-booked sales appointments delivered since 2017 across coaches, consultants, RTOs, course creators, finance brokers and B2B service firms in Australia, USA, UK, Canada, NZ and Europe. Named clients include Sam Tajvidi (121 Brokers), Marcus Wilkinson (Iron Body), Foundr, SheSells.online and Lambda Academy. Wikidata Q139846230. See full Pay-Per-Result pricing →